Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label DevOps QA

QA is Not Just a Job, It’s a Responsibility — and AI is Becoming Our Co-Pilot

QA is Not Just a Job, It’s a Responsibility — and AI is Becoming Our Co-Pilot Quality • AI • Testing QA is Not Just a Job, It’s a Responsibility — and AI is Becoming Our Co-Pilot By The Bugged But Happy • Sep 28, 2025 Have you ever used an app that froze at the wrong time, or a website that crashed while you were making a payment? That’s why QA is not just a job ; it’s a responsibility to protect trust. AI isn’t here to replace testers. It’s here to act as a co-pilot — automating repetitive work and enabling QA to focus on judgment, creativity, and quality ownership. Why QA is a Responsibility Protecting user trust Safeguarding brand reputation Preventing financial losses ...

Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) Testing in 2025: Strategies, Tools, and Best Practices

Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) Testing in 2025: Strategies, Tools, and Best Practices CI/CD testing is the backbone of modern software delivery: it ensures that frequent code changes do not break existing behaviour and gives teams confidence to ship quickly. In 2025, CI/CD testing must scale across microservices, cloud-native infrastructure, mobile, and AI-powered features — while preserving fast feedback loops for developers. This guide explains practical strategies, recommended tools, CI patterns, and measurable best practices so your pipelines stay fast, reliable, and informative. Table of contents 1. Why CI/CD testing matters in 2025 2. Core principles and testing types 3. CI/CD pipeline patterns (practical examples) 4. Recommended toolchain for 2025 5. Parallelization, selective execution & smart test selection 6. Observability, artifacts & feedback loops 7. Common pitfalls and how to avoid them...

Shift-Left Testing in 2025: Strategies, Tools, and Best Practices for Modern QA

Shift-Left Testing in 2025: Strategies, Tools, and Best Practices for Modern QA Shift-left testing isn't a buzzword — it's a practical change in how teams design, build, and verify software. Put simply: move testing and quality thinking earlier in the lifecycle (requirements, design, and developer commits), and your teams will find and fix issues when they’re cheapest to resolve. In 2025, with microservices, CI/CD, and AI-enabled features, shift-left is a business imperative. 1. Executive Summary Shift-left testing means integrating testing activities as early as possible in the development process. This article covers why it matters in 2025, the practices and tools that make it work, the cultural changes required, measurable metrics, common pitfalls, a 30-day practical plan, and concrete CI/CD patterns you can copy into your pipelines. 2. What exactly is Shift-Left Testing? At its core, shift-left testing moves verification tasks earlier — from...

Exploratory Testing: A Complete Guide for QA in 2025

Exploratory Testing: A Complete Guide for QA in 2025 Automation is everywhere in 2025 — unit tests, CI gates, AI-assisted test generation, and automated regression suites. Still, there’s a kind of testing automation can’t replace: exploratory testing . Rooted in human curiosity, domain knowledge, and real-time thinking, exploratory testing finds the unexpected: the tiny UX friction that confuses users, the edge case logic that breaks under certain inputs, the combination of features that produces surprising behaviour. This guide explains what exploratory testing is, why it’s vital in 2025, how to run it effectively, and how to combine it with automation and observability so you deliver higher-quality software faster. 1. What Is Exploratory Testing? Exploratory testing is simultaneous test design, execution, and learning. Instead of following a fixed script step-by-step, testers explore the application, construct hypotheses, and adapt as they learn. It’s structur...

๐Ÿš€ Human + AI = The Future of QA Engineers

Human + AI = The Next Generation of QA Engineers Quality Assurance has always evolved with the software we build. We moved from purely manual checklists to automation frameworks, from sporadic releases to CI/CD pipelines, and now we’re stepping into an era where human judgment teams up with artificial intelligence . The result is not about fewer testers—it’s about stronger testers : professionals who wield AI to design smarter tests, predict failure patterns, reduce flaky noise, and measure quality where users actually feel it. Table of Contents Why Now: The Forces Reshaping QA The Human + AI Collaboration Model Five Case Studies: AI in Action AI Testing Tool Comparison (2025) Practical Workflows: From Idea to Pipeline New Metrics for an AI-First QA Practice Skills & Learning Path for Next-Gen QA Risks, Ethics & Guardrails Quick FAQs Conclusion & Action Checklist ...

From Boring Bugs to Smart Testing: How AI is Transforming QA

๐Ÿš€ How AI is Changing QA: A Tester’s Story You’ll Relate To ๐Ÿš€ How AI is Changing QA: A Tester’s Story You’ll Relate To I still remember my early days in QA. Running the same regression suite again and again. Fixing broken Selenium locators every time the dev team changed a button name. Spending hours staring at logs to figure out if the failure was in the code, the environment, or just a flaky test. Sound familiar? ๐Ÿ˜… That’s the reality many testers live in today. But here’s the twist: AI is quietly becoming the teammate we didn’t know we needed. Let me show you how. 1. ๐Ÿ“ Smarter Test Case Design — Without Guesswork Back in 2018, I worked on a retail app where checkout was always buggy. But our test cases treated checkout the same as other flows. Result? Production bugs. Now imagine AI analyzing production logs and telling you: ๐Ÿ‘‰ “Hey, 70% of user complaints come ...

Test Cases Are Killing QA: Burn the Old Playbook

๐Ÿ”ฅ Test Cases Are Killing QA: Why It’s Time to Burn the Old Playbook Still writing test cases in 2025? Then congratulations — you’re not testing , you’re filling out digital forms to make your manager feel safe. The harsh truth? Test cases are the death of real testing. They’ve become a ritual — mindless, outdated, and dangerously overrated. ⚰️ Test Cases Were Useful — 10 Years Ago Sure, back in the Stone Age of Waterfall, test cases made sense: Massive specs No automation Months between releases But in today’s Agile, DevOps, AI-driven world , they’re a joke. We’re releasing weekly (or daily), and still documenting how to “click login” like it’s the 90s. “Expected Result: User is logged in.” Wow. Revolutionary. ๐Ÿงจ The Ugly Truth No One Wants to Admit Test cases are written to check a box , not catch bugs. Most aren’t updated — ...