Bugged_But_Haapy

Exploratory Testing: A Complete Guide for QA in 2025 Automation is everywhere in 2025 — unit tests, CI gates, AI-assisted test generation, and automated regression suites. Still, there’s a kind of testing automation can’t replace: exploratory testing . Rooted in human curiosity, domain knowledge, and real-time thinking, exploratory testing finds the unexpected: the tiny UX friction that confuses users, the edge case logic that breaks under certain inputs, the combination of features that produces surprising behaviour. This guide explains what exploratory testing is, why it’s vital in 2025, how to run it effectively, and how to combine it with automation and observability so you deliver higher-quality software faster. 1. What Is Exploratory Testing? Exploratory testing is simultaneous test design, execution, and learning. Instead of following a fixed script step-by-step, testers explore the application, construct hypotheses, and adapt as they learn. It’s structur...

Manual Testing in Agile: Still Relevant in 2025? With the rise of automation, AI-powered tools, and DevOps pipelines, many wonder if manual testing is still relevant in 2025. The short answer: Yes . While automation dominates regression and repetitive tasks, manual testing continues to play a vital role in Agile methodologies — especially in exploratory, usability, and acceptance testing. In this blog, we’ll explore the significance of manual testing in Agile environments, where it fits alongside automation, and how QA professionals can maximize its value. 1. The Agile Landscape in 2025 Agile teams in 2025 deliver features faster than ever. Sprints average 1–2 weeks, and continuous delivery pipelines push code multiple times per day. In this context, automation ensures speed, but manual testing ensures quality from the user’s perspective . 2. Why Manual Testing Still Matters Exploratory Testing: Humans can discover unexpected behaviors automation scripts mis...

Writing Effective Test Cases in 2025 (With Real Examples & Templates) Even with AI, automation, and advanced DevOps practices, test cases remain the backbone of quality assurance in 2025. Whether automated or manual, a well-written test case ensures that software functionality is validated, edge cases are covered, and teams maintain shared understanding. But writing effective test cases is more than just filling out a template. It requires clarity, precision, and relevance to business goals. In this guide, we’ll cover: What a test case is in 2025 Key elements of a strong test case Step-by-step process to write one Real-world examples & templates Best practices and mistakes to avoid 1. What is a Test Case? A test case is a structured document that describes input, execution steps, expected output, and postconditions to validate a software feature. In modern QA, test cases serve both as executable scripts (for automation) and as documentat...

🚀 How AI is Changing QA: A Tester’s Story You’ll Relate To 🚀 How AI is Changing QA: A Tester’s Story You’ll Relate To I still remember my early days in QA. Running the same regression suite again and again. Fixing broken Selenium locators every time the dev team changed a button name. Spending hours staring at logs to figure out if the failure was in the code, the environment, or just a flaky test. Sound familiar? 😅 That’s the reality many testers live in today. But here’s the twist: AI is quietly becoming the teammate we didn’t know we needed. Let me show you how. 1. 📝 Smarter Test Case Design — Without Guesswork Back in 2018, I worked on a retail app where checkout was always buggy. But our test cases treated checkout the same as other flows. Result? Production bugs. Now imagine AI analyzing production logs and telling you: 👉 “Hey, 70% of user complaints come ...

🔥 Test Cases Are Killing QA: Why It’s Time to Burn the Old Playbook Still writing test cases in 2025? Then congratulations — you’re not testing , you’re filling out digital forms to make your manager feel safe. The harsh truth? Test cases are the death of real testing. They’ve become a ritual — mindless, outdated, and dangerously overrated. ⚰️ Test Cases Were Useful — 10 Years Ago Sure, back in the Stone Age of Waterfall, test cases made sense: Massive specs No automation Months between releases But in today’s Agile, DevOps, AI-driven world , they’re a joke. We’re releasing weekly (or daily), and still documenting how to “click login” like it’s the 90s. “Expected Result: User is logged in.” Wow. Revolutionary. 🧨 The Ugly Truth No One Wants to Admit Test cases are written to check a box , not catch bugs. Most aren’t updated — ...

Will AI Replace QA? Not If You’ve Met Me Will AI Replace QA? Not If You’ve Met Me “So... are you worried about AI taking your job?” That’s what my cousin asked me right after ChatGPT helped her write a break-up text. 😐 I laughed. Because honestly, if AI can’t even end a relationship without sounding like a LinkedIn post, I think my job as a QA tester is safe — for now. 👩‍💻 The Great Panic: Testers vs AI? It’s 2025. Your dev team just dropped a buggy build at 6 PM. Your PM is on vacation. And someone, somewhere, just whispered: “Can’t AI just do the testing now?” Welcome to the golden age of confusion. Tools like TestGPT, Copilot, Mabl, and Scriptless Testing are promising to: Generate test cases Write code Find bugs Make coffee (well, not yet...) But here’s the truth: AI isn't here to replace us. It's here to remind us we’re more than button-clickers. 💡 The Old Way vs The Ne...