Skip to main content

Test Cases Are Killing QA: Burn the Old Playbook

🔥 Test Cases Are Killing QA: Why It’s Time to Burn the Old Playbook

Still writing test cases in 2025?

Then congratulations — you’re not testing, you’re filling out digital forms to make your manager feel safe.

The harsh truth?
Test cases are the death of real testing. They’ve become a ritual — mindless, outdated, and dangerously overrated.

⚰️ Test Cases Were Useful — 10 Years Ago

Sure, back in the Stone Age of Waterfall, test cases made sense:

  • Massive specs
  • No automation
  • Months between releases

But in today’s Agile, DevOps, AI-driven world, they’re a joke. We’re releasing weekly (or daily), and still documenting how to “click login” like it’s the 90s.

“Expected Result: User is logged in.”
Wow. Revolutionary.

🧨 The Ugly Truth No One Wants to Admit

  • Test cases are written to check a box, not catch bugs.
  • Most aren’t updated — ever.
  • No one reads them. Not devs. Not PMs. Not even testers.
  • Execution = “Click ‘Pass’ and move on.”

They’re fake coverage. A safety blanket. A lie we all agree to live with.

🛑 Test Cases Are Hurting QA — Not Helping

  • Killing creativity: Testers become robots following scripts.
  • Wasting time: Hours spent updating test cases instead of testing real risk areas.
  • Slowing down releases: “We can’t deploy, the test cases aren’t documented.” 😐
  • Avoiding ownership: When a bug escapes, blame the test case. Easy scapegoat.
You’re not shipping quality. You’re shipping spreadsheets.

👊 Enough Is Enough. Here’s What Real Testers Do:

  • 🧠 Think. Break. Question.
  • 🕵️ Explore. Investigate. Observe.
  • 💣 Take risks. Prioritize. Speak up.

Real testers don’t write test cases.
They expose assumptions, shake up teams, and find what no test case ever could.

🧢 “But We Need Documentation!”

Documentation ≠ mindless scripts.
Write lean checklists. Record session notes. Use automation logs.
Stop writing instructions for things the dev already tested in unit tests.

🚀 Final Word: Burn the Playbook

If you’re still counting test cases like they mean something, wake up.

You’re measuring quantity, not quality.

🔥 Let them go.
🔥 Challenge the system.
🔥 Be the tester who stops faking coverage and starts demanding real quality.

💬 Your Turn — Fight Me in the Comments

  • Agree? Disagree? Triggered?
  • Are test cases still valuable — or just corporate theater?
  • What’s the most useless test case you were ever forced to write?

Like it, hate it, share it. But don’t ignore it.
The future of QA doesn’t have room for dead weight.

Test Cases Are Dead Image
Labels:
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

AI Agents in DevOps: Automating CI/CD Pipelines for Smarter Software Delivery

AI Agents in DevOps: Automating CI/CD Pipelines for Smarter Software Delivery Bugged But Happy · September 8, 2025 · ~10 min read Not long ago, release weekends were a rite of passage: long nights, pizza, and the constant fear that something in production would break. Agile and DevOps changed that. We ship more often, but the pipeline still trips on familiar things — slow reviews, costly regression tests, noisy alerts. That’s why teams are trying something new: AI agents that don’t just run scripts, but reason about them. In this post I’ll walk through what AI agents mean for CI/CD, where they actually add value, the tools and vendors shipping these capabilities today, and the practical risks teams need to consider. No hype—just what I’ve seen work in the field and references you can check out. What ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Autonomous Testing with AI Agents: Faster Releases & Self-Healing Tests (2025)

Autonomous Testing with AI Agents: How Testing Is Changing in 2025 From self-healing scripts to agents that create, run and log tests — a practical look at autonomous testing. I still remember those late release nights — QA running regression suites until the small hours, Jira tickets piling up, and deployment windows slipping. Testing used to be the slowest gear in the machine. In 2025, AI agents are taking on the repetitive parts: generating tests, running them, self-healing broken scripts, and surfacing real problems for humans to solve. Quick summary: Autonomous testing = AI agents that generate, run, analyze and maintain tests. Big wins: coverage and speed. Big caveats: governance and human oversight. What is Autonomous Testing? Traditional automation (Selenium, C...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is Hyperautomation? Complete Guide with Examples, Benefits & Challenges (2025)

What is Hyperautomation?Why Everyone is Talking About It in 2025 Introduction When I first heard about hyperautomation , I honestly thought it was just RPA with a fancier name . Another buzzword to confuse IT managers and impress consultants. But after digging into Gartner, Deloitte, and case studies from banks and manufacturers, I realized this one has real weight. Gartner lists hyperautomation as a top 5 CIO priority in 2025 . Deloitte says 67% of organizations increased hyperautomation spending in 2024 . The global market is projected to grow from $12.5B in 2024 to $60B by 2034 . What is Hyperautomation? RPA = one robot doing repetitive copy-paste jobs. Hyperautomation = an entire digital workforce that uses RPA + AI + orchestration + analytics + process mining to automate end-to-end workflows . Formula: Hyperautomation = RPA + AI + ML + Or...
Post a Comment
Read more